R3Now.com – No Nonsense Answers for IT Leaders – Results Oriented ERP, SAP, and IT Solutions: “ERP Software Selection: Do you want to be a Guinea Pig?” plus 1 more | |
| ERP Software Selection: Do you want to be a Guinea Pig? Posted: 08 Aug 2010 09:22 PM PDT
Back in the 1980's, IT department preferences or mandates to use specific proprietary mainframe technologies drove many ERP software decisions. This was about the technologies the IT department could (or would) support not the mainframe software that best satisfied business needs. Later in the 1990's the mainframe vs. "open system" (client/server) wars caused many to take a blind leap of faith into open systems only to find out later the ERP software functionality in this arena was not as mature as their mainframe counterparts. Though open systems eventually won, many jumped head first into this brave new world simply at the wrong time. Today "open source ERP", upstart internet based application services (SaaS), "cloud computing" and other paradigms represent the same fork in the road. It is guaranteed tomorrow there will be a new one. The point is not to generalize regarding any particular direction; but the lessons of the past must not be ignored…. If the software functionality does not do what we need it to do, nothing else really matters. When this occurs everyone will forget all the seemingly valid reasons a package was selected in the first place (cheaper, newer technology or everyone else is starting to do it). They will focus on the lousy functionality and lack of project benefits. In the real world budgets are not unlimited, technology can be a strategic enabler, and there are other important trade-offs. However, nine times out of ten if the software functionality is a bad fit, eventually the project is deemed a failure. This means software decisions that do not weigh functionality the most can defeat the purpose of a new ERP system. The Future of ERP?The message above seems simple enough (and almost elementary), but many smart people allow themselves to get caught up in the industry hype. Let the academics and consultants who really care debate the future of ERP because in the meantime you have a business to run. Unless you are interested in becoming a guinea pig. Believe me, a lot of software vendors are looking for them. The Right Side of ERP HistorySelecting software is not just a quantitative process. It ultimately boils down to a business decision and you want to be on the right side of history. As long as the cost of ownership is affordable, the technology stable, the package is supported, and many other companies are using it; go with the software that best meets business needs. If the organization cannot find a package that satisfies at least 85% of the overall software requirements (and almost all of the important ones), it is time to either look at higher-end packages or redesign your business processes. ========================= Editor's commentary - Steve Phillips runs a great blog which is linked here: http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/street-smart-erp Be sure to visit his site and support his efforts! Related Posts: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Removing SAP Project Barriers to Realize ROI and Business Benefit Posted: 01 Aug 2010 09:09 PM PDT
Frequently I see or hear SAP consultants, even those who claim to be "Platinum" level consultants who really do not understand the extent of the capabilities of SAP as a business process and systems platform. Even though these Platinum consultants may have many years of experience with SAP, many of them started out in SAP and have little practical business experience before their SAP careers. The SAP implementation environment "includes several stakeholders: from the developers of the system, to the vendors, to the consultants, the project team, and the ultimate users. Each one of these holds a certain cultural assumption towards the ERP implementation and use process. Particularly, the developers' and consultants' cultural assumptions are embedded in the very roots of the software (the technology) itself. Molla, A. and Loukis, I. Success and Failure of ERP Technology Transfer: A Framework for Analysing Congruence of Host and System Cultures, working paper pg. 7, 2005 citing Skok, W. & Legge, M. (2001) Evaluating enterprise resource planning systems using an interpretive approach. Proceedings of the 2001 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer Personnel Research, San Diego, April, pp.189-197. Business Driven Implementations MUST REPLACE System Integrator Driven ImplementationsThe dynamic of a consulting vendor driven implementation must give way to a business driven implementation. Many SAP consultants have never been directly responsible for business activities before their SAP exposure. Few of them also have had to do ongoing business production support work after going live with SAP so they have little business and user experience to ensure business benefit.
This can only occur by having defined the business reasons and drivers for the implementation and then incorporating them into the Request for Proposal (RFP) process. In this way the expectation is set with a vendor that business needs and business expectations will drive the direction of implementation.
Requiring the system integrator to constantly address the business drivers helps to reinforce that expectation throughout the project and to the project team. It also helps to more clearly indentify skilled consultants and resources from those on the project that you may need to replace and request a credit from the system integrator for. After all, if they:
then it is important for you to enforce that in your contract and in your project. A correctly developed business case, RFP, project charter, scope document, system integrator contract (which should include credits for underperforming consultants) and other tools will ensure your project achieves the results you expect. All of these tools serve as opportunities to set the expectation with the consultants, and with the business, that this is a business project for business benefit. A properly done RFP will also help ensure that you are getting the best resources for your money from an implementation vendor. That RFP will also help to ensure you are getting apples to apples proposals and quotes. A solid contract which defines you as the sole determining party for which consultants are performing, and then credit provisions for non-performance, will help to keep things on track as well. Barriers to a Successful SAP ProjectIn 1999 Deloitte Consulting published a piece entitled "ERP's Second Wave" which identified several barriers to successful SAP implementations. I have added a designation for whether they fall into the "People, Process, or Technology" areas.
Notice that although certain functional barriers may fall within a Process or Technology area that every one of the barriers is either strongly, or completely, influenced by People. You simply cannot ignore the People involved in your project. The level of discipline required with SAP dramatically affects organizational norms directly related to the tolerance for change because of the new processes incorporated throughout the enterprise. Sumner, M. (2000) Risk factors in enterprise-wide/ERP projects. Journal of Information Technology, 15, pp.317-327. Since implementation vendors like Deloitte are OBVIOUSLY aware of these barriers to success, why do they continue to repeat them? Worse still, why do customers still allow system integrators to do this? SAP Project Risks and Risk MitigationThis list of barriers provides a great starting point for the project risks you may need to address. Right from the beginning of your project your RFI and RFP system vendor or system integrator evaluation should include an evaluation of these risks. And it can’t stop there either. You must be diligent throughout the project to ensure that your project team is ready and able to address your ongoing project needs from a business perspective. If you are not willing to force your vendor to replace under-performing consultants then you are implicitly accepting being stolen from. After all, when you consider the annualized rate you are paying for those consultants, why again do you pay for resources who are unable to deliver? Be sure to review and evaluate these barriers to success throughout your entire SAP implementation and business project. Related Posts: |
| You are subscribed to email updates from SAP & ERP Business Alignment Answers for IT Leaders To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
R3Now.com – No Nonsense Answers for IT Leaders – Results Oriented ERP, SAP, and IT Solutions: “ERP Software Selection: Do you want to be a Guinea Pig?” plus 1 more Part 1
R3Now.com – No Nonsense Answers for IT Leaders – Results Oriented ERP, SAP, and IT Solutions: “ERP Software Selection: Do you want to be a Guinea Pig?” plus 1 more Part 1
R3Now.com – No Nonsense Answers for IT Leaders – Results Oriented ERP, SAP, and IT Solutions: “ERP Software Selection: Do you want to be a Guinea Pig?” plus 1 more Part 1
Tags: R3Now.com – No Nonsense Answers for IT Leaders – Results Oriented ERP, SAP, and IT Solutions: “ERP Software Selection: Do you want to be a Guinea Pig?” plus 1 more, R3Now.com – No Nonsense Answers for IT Leaders – Results Oriented ERP, SAP, and IT Solutions: “ERP Software Selection: Do you want to be a Guinea Pig?” plus 1 more watch online, full R3Now.com – No Nonsense Answers for IT Leaders – Results Oriented ERP, SAP, and IT Solutions: “ERP Software Selection: Do you want to be a Guinea Pig?” plus 1 more video, R3Now.com – No Nonsense Answers for IT Leaders – Results Oriented ERP, SAP, and IT Solutions: “ERP Software Selection: Do you want to be a Guinea Pig?” plus 1 more download, R3Now.com – No Nonsense Answers for IT Leaders – Results Oriented ERP, SAP, and IT Solutions: “ERP Software Selection: Do you want to be a Guinea Pig?” plus 1 more torrent, free R3Now.com – No Nonsense Answers for IT Leaders – Results Oriented ERP, SAP, and IT Solutions: “ERP Software Selection: Do you want to be a Guinea Pig?” plus 1 more, R3Now.com – No Nonsense Answers for IT Leaders – Results Oriented ERP, SAP, and IT Solutions: “ERP Software Selection: Do you want to be a Guinea Pig?” plus 1 more megavideo, R3Now.com – No Nonsense Answers for IT Leaders – Results Oriented ERP, SAP, and IT Solutions: “ERP Software Selection: Do you want to be a Guinea Pig?” plus 1 more full, R3Now.com – No Nonsense Answers for IT Leaders – Results Oriented ERP, SAP, and IT Solutions: “ERP Software Selection: Do you want to be a Guinea Pig?” plus 1 more eng sub

As long as SAP implementations are driven by the application consultants' perspective and their limited understanding of your business, the implementation will only reflect their SAP capabilities. If you want more, then your project focus must become business driven rather than vendor and consultant driven.
0 comments:
Post a Comment