Tuesday, August 31, 2010

NoodleFood

NoodleFood

Link to NoodleFood

Hsieh LTE on CO Health Care Choice

Posted: 31 Aug 2010 03:00 PM PDT

The August 30, 2010 Colorado Springs Gazette has published my LTE supporting their position on Amendment 63 (the second one down):
Doctor gives thanks for 63

Thank you for speaking out in favor of the Colorado Health Care Choice Initiative protecting us from mandatory health insurance. This idea forming the core of ObamaCare has already been tried -- and failed -- in Massachusetts, resulting only in skyrocketing health costs, a desperate shortage of doctors, and significantly longer waits for medical care than in the rest of the country. Some Massachusetts patients must now wait almost a year for a routine physical exam.

As a practicing physician, such Massachusetts-style problems are the last thing I want here in Colorado. Colorado voters can avoid the mistakes of Massachusetts by supporting Amendment 63.

Paul Hsieh, MD
Sedalia
The original Gazette OpEd can be found in the August 27, 2010 edition at: "Amendment 63 protects our freedom".

#OLists Happy Hour

Posted: 31 Aug 2010 12:00 PM PDT

I'm eagerly looking forward to tonight's #OList Twitter Happy Hour, given the two topics for discussion:
This week's Appetizer: If you are a blogging parent, how do you handle the issues that come up around blogging about your kids and family life? Do you hold particular boundaries that dictate what you will and will not share on the blog, or do you take an "anything goes" approach? Finally, have your boundaries or standards in this area changed or evolved over time, as your kids get older - or do you expect them to?

This week's Drink Special: Do you blog about your work and/or clients? If so, are you up front about it, or do you keep it a deep dark secret? Do you censor your content, or boldly speak what's on your mind, or some combination of the two? What do you think about "telling all" while sanitizing the relevant identifying information? Have you ever gotten in trouble with a client, co-worker, or employer over your blog's content?
I love those topics! Personally, I've chosen to blog openly about some rather personal details about my hypothyroidism, but I've always been rather discreet about my (now former) colleagues at CU Boulder. I'll be interested to hear what choices others have made -- and why.

Remember: Happy Hour takes place on Twitter from 9-10 p.m. Eastern, 6-7 p.m. Pacific. Use the hashtag #OLists to identify your tweets as part of the Happy Hour, and join us!

For more details on this Happy Hour, see this post. For general information about OLists Twitter Socials, visit the OList.com events page. And don't forget about the #OLists Sunday Brunch!

Oh, and if you'd like to join us but you don't yet have a twitter account, I'd recommend that you sign up for that now, as your #OLists hash tag won't show up in Twitter's search for an hour or three.

The Greater Danger: Islamic or Christian Dictatorship?

Posted: 31 Aug 2010 07:00 AM PDT

This video of Brigitte Gabriel discussing the barbarity of Islam has been making the rounds on blogs and social media recently:



(Note: This is a multi-part video series.)

Diana and I heard Brigitte Gabriel speak at the same LPR 2009 conference that Yaron Brook spoke at. She is a staunch Christian who took an uncompromising stand against the Islamic threat to America. She told some heart-rending stories of life as a Christian under Islamist rule in Lebanon. She made a compelling case that the Islamists want destroy America. And she had the mostly-conservative crowd eating out of her hand.

And she's just one of many eloquent Christian conservatives out there on the lecture circuit making their case against the Islamic threat -- and arguing that the only solution is for this country to recommit to Christian values.

For this reason, I regard her and her allies as a serious long-term danger to America, even though her criticisms of the barbarity of Islam are correct. She correctly identifies the current problem, but she also offers the wrong solution.

Let me explain why I regard the Christians as the greater long-term danger to America -- even while I also agree that the Islamists are the greater immediate short-term threat to this country.

Based on my reading of American culture and sense of life, I personally don't think this country can actually be conquered by the Islamists. Yes, the Islamists will try as hard as they can. And yes, they could do a tremendous amount of damage (with more 9/11-style attacks or worse). And yes, they could kill many Americans in the process. But they couldn't actually take over and impose Sharia law on us.

There's still a general "ornery streak" alive and well amongst many Americans that would reject any such an attempt to subjugate us to Sharia law. Many Americans would fight back by any means necessary -- especially in the much-maligned "Red states" where that ornery streak runs deep and where the populace is well-armed.

(This is in contrast to Europe, where I think many of those countries could fall under Sharia law due to their internal weaknesses).

But I do think that if the Islamists successfully committed more major terrorist attacks on US soil, it would arouse a backlash by decent Americans seeking some kind of forceful response. Conservatives like Brigitte Gabriel would exploit this and use pro-American rhetoric to rouse Americans against the Islamists. And this breed of conservatives might even implement a somewhat better foreign policy, at least for a while.

But they also would couple that with appeals to Christianity, sacrifice, faith, etc. -- all in the name of being "pro-America". Those are the sorts of appeals that the neocons, John McCain, and other bad conservatives have been making for many years -- and which would strike a renewed chord in an America shaken up by a string of deadly attacks at home and abroad. Americans would likely reject our current policy of appeasement (correctly seeing it as having weakened this country), but would instead embrace an even worse nationalism. And without a firm commitment to individual rights, any new conservative nationalist government would very likely impose a variety of "emergency" measures that might be superficially reasonable (and might even be appropriate in short-term wartime settings), but would somehow never be repealed.

If dictatorship ever comes to America, it won't be an Islamist one. Instead, it will more likely be a Christian one, but one which would arise as a direct result of our current weak approach to the real and immediate Islamist threats. Furthermore, such a Christianist regime could gain traction here in a way that an Islamist regime never could because the Christianist regime would have a superficially "pro-American" veneer.

Tellingly, polls taken in the past few years show the following:
Given these facts, I think a Christian dictatorship could appeal to many Americans in a time of crisis, especially if it came to power on a platform of fighting back against the Islamists -- and if it were viewed as the only moral alternative to the policies of appeasement and secularism that allowed such attacks to happen in the first place.

Hence, it's critical to both oppose the immediate and serious Islamist danger, but also be alert to the Christian totalitarian threat.

Back in 1980, many Americans (correctly) recognized the USSR as a threat, but also thought that we could use the Islamist mujahideen fighters in Afghanistan as allies against the communists. Of course today the USSR is no more, but the Islamists are now a real danger to us in a way that few (myself included) anticipated 30 years ago.

But as more conservatives start speaking out against Islam, I want to highlight the importance of closely examining what they stand for in addition to what they are against.

And on a positive note, I also wanted to highlight the importance of offering Americans an alternative principled self-interested approach to foreign policy that doesn't rely on appeals to faith, altruism, and sacrifice. Fortunately, we have such an approach to offer. Let's hope our message reaches enough Americans before it's too late.

NoodleFood, Here you can watch NoodleFood online. Recently it is the latest update serial play for the NoodleFood.NoodleFood is fully Eng Subbed, and avail in eng sub. Now it is availab le to watch online. you can watch NoodleFood by the given links below, click on NoodleFood Parts below to watch online. NoodleFood Vidoe is source of Mega Video, Youtube etc, so you can watch NoodleFood without any issue.

NoodleFood Part 1

NoodleFood Part 1

NoodleFood Part 1

Tags: NoodleFood, NoodleFood watch online, full NoodleFood video, NoodleFood download, NoodleFood torrent, free NoodleFood, NoodleFood megavideo, NoodleFood full, NoodleFood eng sub

Posted by ADMIN at 6:07 PM  

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)